Skip to Content
Need-to-Know Litigation Weekly

A&O Shearman

Need-to-Know Litigation Weekly

Welcome to A&O Shearman's Need-To-Know Litigation Weekly, which analyzes notable U.S. decisions, orders and developments each week in areas of Securities Litigation, Government/Regulatory Enforcement, M&A and Corporate Governance, Antitrust Litigation and IP Litigation. This weekly newsletter is intended to supplement our various publications and thought leadership concerning these important substantive areas.


Securities Litigation


Northern District Of California Dismisses Putative Securities Class Action Against Value Grocery Retailer Without Prejudice

On September 16, 2026, Judge Jon S. Tigar of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California dismissed a putative securities class action against a value grocery retailer (the “Company”) and its former CEO and CFO (collectively, “Defendants”). In re Grocery Outlet Holding Corp. Sec. Litig., No. 4:25-cv-957-JST (N.D. Cal. Sept. 16, 2026).
Read More


District Of Massachusetts Dismisses Putative Class Action Against Gene Therapy Company For Failure To Adequately Allege Misstatements And Scienter

On September 15, 2026, Judge Brian E. Murphy of the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts dismissed with prejudice a putative class action asserting claims under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 against a gene therapy company and certain of its executives. In re Sarepta Therapeutics Sec. Litig., 2026 WL 2720122 (D. Mass. Sept. 15, 2026).
Read More


Government/Regulatory Enforcement


CFTC Adopts 30 Percent Presumption For Smaller Whistleblower Awards

On September 11, 2026, the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (“CFTC” or “the Commission”) announced that it had approved a final rule amending its whistleblower rules to increase presumptive payouts for smaller awards.
Read More


Consulting Firm Pays $21.5 Million To Settle False Claims Act Allegations Arising From Race And Sex Based Employment Practices

On August 25, 2026, the United States Department of Justice (“DOJ”) announced a $21.5 million settlement with various U.S. affiliated entities of a global tax and consulting firm (“Consulting Firm”) to resolve allegations that the Consulting Firm violated the False Claims Act by knowingly submitting false claims and making false statements to the federal government in connection with race and sex-based employment practices.
Read More


M&A and Corporate Governance


Delaware Court Of Chancery Invalidates Board’s Rejection Of Activist’s Director Nomination Notice

On August 28, 2026, Vice Chancellor Lori W. Will of the Delaware Court of Chancery in a post-trial decision on expedited claims invalidated the board of directors’ rejection of an activist investor’s nomination notice in a proxy context involving a publicly traded corporation that holds Bitcoin as a primary asset (the “Company”). ATG Cap. Opportunities Fund LP v. Lane, C.A. No. 2026-0447-LWW (Del. Ch. Aug. 28, 2026).
Read More


Delaware Chancery Counts Stockholder Consents Obtained Post-Litigation in Majority Vote Removing Director

On September 15, 2026, Chancellor Kathaleen McCormick entered post-trial judgment for defendant after a summary proceeding under Section 225 of the Delaware General Corporation Law (the “DGCL”), which governs proceedings for contested board seats, challenging plaintiff’s removal from the board of directors of a private security technology company. Freiberg v. Xonar Tech. Inc., C.A. No. 2026-0093-KSJM (Del. Ch. Sept. 15, 2026).
Read More


Antitrust Litigation


Michigan Court Dismisses Energy Antitrust Suit For Lack Of Standing

On September 22, 2026, Judge Jane M. Beckering of the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Michigan dismissed with prejudice a federal antitrust action brought by the State of Michigan against four energy companies and the American Petroleum Institute (“API”). People of the State of Michigan v. BP, P.L.C., et al., No. 1:26-cv-254 (W.D. Mich. Sept. 22, 2026).
Read More


District Court Denies Cardboard-Makers’ Motion To Dismiss In Price-Fixing Class Action

On September 4, 2026, the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois denied motions to dismiss claims against major containerboard manufacturers accused of conspiring to fix the prices of containerboard products in violation of Section 1 of the Sherman Act. Artuso Pastry Foods Corp. v. Packaging Corp. of America et al., No. 1:25-cv-08856 (N.D. Ill. Sept. 4, 2026).
Read More


Intellectual Property Litigation


Ninth Circuit Finds LLM Coding Agent Outputs Did Not Violate Digital Millenium Copyright Act by Not Including Attribution

In Doe v. GitHub, Inc., No. 24-7700 (9th Cir. Sept. 16, 2026) the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, on interlocutory appeal, affirmed a district court dismissal of claims under the DMCA related to LLM-based coding tools trained on open-source code.
Read More


Federal Circuit Affirms Summary Judgment Of Noninfringement Based On Limiting Preambles And Denial Of JMOL Of Noninfringement For Substantial Evidence

On September 11, 2026, the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit affirmed the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania’s grant of summary judgment of noninfringement as to two patents and denial of plaintiff’s motion for judgment as a matter of law (“JMOL”) of infringement as to a third patent. Moskowitz Family LLC v. Globus Medical, Inc., No. 2024-1696 (Fed. Cir. Sept. 11, 2026).
Read More